SAVE OUR COMMUNITY FROM UNCARING PEOPLE!



SAVE OUR COMMUNITY FROM UNCARING PEOPLE!
Working hand in hand with developers, Langley Township continue to force a plan that will change the landscape of Brookswood from a community with rural (“Horse capital of BC”) roots to a crowded urban wasteland of row housing and condos just like so many other communities in the Lower Mainland. We believe Langley Township is listening to the wrong people, and we wonder if the planners and “experts” who have devised this plan actually live in this community. It seems the Township doesn't care about keeping our community a beautiful place to live, where people can own larger properties with big trees, they just care about squeezing as many people (and as many tax dollars) out of the land as they possibly can. Don't let them do this to us and our wonderful community, don't let them destroy where we live the same way they did Willoughby! We CAN stop them! Gather together to save our homes and save the brooks and woods in Brookswood. Make your voice heard. Contact the Township of Langley, attend their meetings to find out what they have planned for your neighbourhood, voice your disapproval!

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

A Promise for the Protection of Brookswood/Fernridge




The world overpopulating is bad for all of us.



'Pack em in' like they did in Willoughby IS NOT a good policy for Brookswood/Fernridge.



We will always oppose urbanization and maximum population growth (maximum developer profit) in the area.



The developers cannot have their way like they did with Willoughby.



Yes it seems our mayor has been bought, but it doesn't mean he and his buddies can get their way. They will have to be responsible and moderate in their approach.



The developers and builders must reject their base profit making instinct and use a more European, well planned, lower population approach that leaves most of the trees and land untouched instead of the slash-and-dash, English row housing, condos-and-townhouses-everywhere-blocking-out-the-sun approach that is not in keeping with the natural state of the area.



The residents wont stand for anything else.



I cannot believe that we have to deal with the magnitude of crap that is being built in Langley, especially after the poor example that Surrey provided us over the last several decades.

Come on!  You could have done much, much better.   

Poorly done people, poorly done.

Friday, January 22, 2016

Question: Is changing the boundaries of a community without public referendum or consultation legal?


Pocket Politician - Definition

1. Having a political leader at your disposal to help further your own agenda. Usually involves kickbacks, the promise of present or future perks or peddling of influence due to political donations.

2. Buying politicians.

3. To keep a politician 'in your back pocket.'

So they want to push north to 32nd east of 208th. Well that's just pushy.

This is my neighbourhood.  I was going to just watch and encourage responsible development.  But now...

Builders of Harmony


This is excerpt from book I recently read.

'Fighter Pilot: The Memoirs of Legendary Ace Robin Olds'  Olds upon discovering the English countryside:

"I realized that the trees and fields, the buildings and barns, the small villages and narrow winding roads all fit together seamlessly, blended by time into harmony.  No one thing intruded on each other.  Each fit the scene as though a natural process had ordained symmetry."

Kind of sounds like what Brookswood and it's trees have become over time.

This is what I want Developers and Planners to realize.

Development doesn't have to be Progressively Invasive.

You don't have to destroy the character of a community by widening beautiful two lane country roads everywhere.  You don't have to crush and tear things apart to build, and you don't have to bulldoze everything and then leave a few sprigs behind in your wake after replacing every tree on a lot with a 'Unit.'  You can be more than just builders plugging homes and apartments into the earth, you can be sculptors creating something you can be proud of, and finally rid yourselves of that nagging feeling of discontent over what you are slapping together now.

My dad was a builder.  He and his crew made many of the cottages and homes in Ontario's Cottage Country.  Today's builders jokingly say they hate him for it is always much harder to tear apart the places he has built for they were always solid and true, and he guaranteed that not a mouse could squeeze into them.  Looking back at him I can say that he was a craftsman in every sense of the word, he built structures to fit with the land and he maintained that harmony.  He built around, not through.  He could teach much to todays builders, even the ones who THINK they are good builders.

You can either create or destroy communities.  It may eat a little more into your profit margins, and may take more of an effort but I think it's worth it.  Maybe it's time to consider more closely your role in the community...

...and set the bar higher.


Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Shelley Fralic: Heads up, Metro Vancouver mayors: A revolt is brewing

 
 

Shelley Fralic: Heads up, Metro Vancouver mayors: A revolt is brewing

 

That something in the air? It’s anger

 
 
35
 
 

 

Great neighbourhoods are being destroyed, one old home at a time, writes Shelley Fralic.

Does it seem to you, as it does to me, that rarely a day goes by without yet another story of how Metro Vancouver real estate is being bulldozed, foreign-owned, over-priced, over-built, developer-designed and any other term to denote that our little urban world is changing faster than an ordinary taxpaying citizen can keep up with?
Does it also seem to you, as it does to me, although it’s a strictly anecdotal and gut-based observation, that the accelerated pace of demolition and new construction that is so drastically transforming our neighbourhoods has finally awakened the sleeping giant?
No question about it. There is something in the air these days.
Anger.
Civic taxpayers seem to be shaking off voter complacency and replacing it with outrage and outspokenness, filling council chambers and development meetings and all manner of public forums with a unified message: They no longer trust city hall politicians and bureaucrats to listen to their concerns or represent the greater public good in the face of unbridled growth and runaway residential and commercial development in their communities.
Last week, a column I wrote about New Westminster’s upcoming Official Community Plan, and the massive rezoning changes some of its proposed scenarios would foist upon the city, was meant as a wake-up call to residents. Speak up now, I enjoined, or forever hold your peace when your neighbourhood is suddenly unrecognizable.
And the inbox avalanche, from all over the region, began.
We agree, readers said, everyone needs to be involved in change. But there was also this overriding sentiment: We can’t trust our growth-at-any-cost elected representatives; we fear decisions are made well before the public is given a say and thus our input is meaningless. Oh, and we’re sick and tired of developers and consultants deciding how and when, if at all, our neighbourhoods should be rezoned and reimagined in the name of progress.
A sampling of the many comments:
“At what point is enough, enough? Do our leaders envision Los Angeles north? Should we aim to be larger than Toronto? Do residents really want more urban chaos and pollution and fewer tress and open spaces?”
“Developers are salivating and our elected officials have their own agendas.”
“The ‘planners’ of Langley and Langley Township are sorely out of sync with the current population growth and the needs for infrastructure. Decisions are made in the same way as New West. Count on the lack of resident participation and charge forward without consideration of the area’s immediate needs.”
“It may be that this eagerness to permit excessive residential development has its origins in the generous donations by developers that keep elected officials in office. In any case, it is wise not to accept the official rationale for development in your neighbourhood at face value.”
“Density is not destiny. It is a choice. Density does not add one more square inch of parks or roads. In fact, it subtracts at the margins. It is very puzzling that the population has bought into the ‘one million people are coming by 2040’ statement without any significant questioning of the wisdom thereof.”
“Welcome to West Coquitlam. They want suggestions for a new name? I sent in Bosa Town. Our lovely 60-year-plus neighbourhood is going away, house by house. We were told by Major Stewart and his merry band of councillors you have to look at the ‘big picture.’ West Coquitlam was a great place to raise our family. That way of life has now changed to make way for the high rises. Time to head for the hills. Oh wait, no more hills? They’re gone and replaced by multiple dwellings.”
Granted, it’s hardly a scientific sample, but if I were a Metro Vancouver municipal official, I wouldn’t discount the simmering anger that has been building of late among the folks who pay the bills and have a vested interest in what you are doing to their streets.
Your people are mad as hell, and if the sound and fury of their growing discontent is any indication, they are not going to take it any more.


Read more:http://www.vancouversun.com/business/shelley+fralic+heads+metro+vancouver+mayors+revolt+brewing/11660313/story.html#ixzz3xiUnMx9o

Saturday, March 28, 2015

Brookswood OCP Redux...

They are going to try and resurrect the Brookwood OCP.  I'm sure the developers are pushing hard for this and are more than gently reminding members of our council of the money they gave to their campaigns or discussing their future support in some secret way...

Might I remind council that the 2014 input and findings are what caused such an uproar, a demonstration, a march, signs everywhere, bad provincial press, and multiple night marathon counsel meetings containing angry residents.

People were angry with the bate-and-switch techniques used in the planning process and the general dishonesty by withholding information and attempts at spin...

It is this dishonesty displayed during the planning process and the fact that the GNAC had direct access to the planner and was influencing the outcome that further aggravated residents causing them to act.

The resulting bias made the 2014 report unreliable and suspect.

If there is an attempt to use the 2014 findings I suspect there will be a repeat of the outrage shown a year ago as many on the counsel may remember.

But then again we are destined to make the same mistakes over and over again until we learn our lesson, so why would our local politicians be any different?




Friday, March 27, 2015

Flooding in Langley City

WOW, that's a lot of rain coming down lately!

You know the developers haven't left many trees behind in Willoughby et all to slow the water down that is soaking us all from the sky.  I wonder if this will cause flooding in Langley City and the low lying areas of Langley Township?

If so it could be costly and take much to initiate and manage the extraordinary measures at flood control as a result.

Would that be called negligence on the part of the TOL Planning department and the Developers who were in such a rush to tear up all the trees to slap together their versions of buildings?

There is no wonder why the city of Langley was so interested in the OCP fight a year ago.  They knew they were going to have flood issues if a mass high density development happened in Brookswood.

It's going to be an interesting future in the two Langley's.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Good to see some months of discussion hapening.

Remember to act after its conclusion.  Also remember that not all criminals, homeless people or druggies want to be saved, so you have to think about what do do with them.  That is if you dive into this thinking you are going to save them.

Langley City task forces will look at homelessness, crime issues

http://www.langleytimes.com/news/290578401.html




Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Langley transportation vote debate

http://www.cbc.ca/news/langley-transportation-vote-debate-1.2919578

Does Jack (who lives close to Abbostford) promise that after he helps raise transit taxes he wont go to Abbotsford to by goods and gas?  Will he make use of the scores of buses that 'Link Transportation' service throughout Aldergrove, an area where Jack lives?  I'm sure the business owners and my fellow Langley Citizens would agree that we aren't getting much for the tons of funds that we are throwing down the Translink well.

Personally I think TransLink is a bit of a scam - and a poorly run one at that.

See also a piece by Eric Woodward:  http://www.langleycitizen.com/2015/01/09/120


Saturday, January 3, 2015

Some perspective on Brookswood development - Letter to the Editor

 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Some perspective on Brookswood development

posted Jul 21, 2014 at 5:00 PM by Joel Nagtegaal - Langley

http://www.langleytimes.com/opinion/letters/268026121.html


I did write: save Brookswood from becoming "a crowded urban wasteland of row housing and condos” and I'm glad that it's getting some attention and in fact prompted your thoughtful letter.

I thought of writing that line just as I headed south over the bridge at 208th and hwy 1.  As I looked around what came to mind was a wasteland, a sterile, treeless and unimaginative cyst on the Langley landscape, brought about by those who worship a candy-coated international box style chosen for it's ability to shoehorn as many families into as small an area as possible thus maximize the money intake or in other words: 'Profit Enhancement.'  It's obvious the developers are in control there while the planners flop around like so many stunned fish.

Our planning department could have prevented this but they let the developers have their way.  Those developers promptly shunned thoughtful infrastructure in favour of profits - their ill conceived leavings to be mopped up by the taxpayers at a later time.  You may not like my choice of words but they are fully informed from observation.  I chose not to be blind and decided to protect the future of Brookswood.

People got upset in Brookswood for the developers, planners and township officials thought they could play us for fools.  That they could just come in unopposed and 'set-up shop' like they have done everywhere else in the lower mainland.   That a population of 42K, and the widening 40th avenue to 4 lanes and shoving it through Brookswood park could just be slid into the plans near the end of the planning process as long as they felt the breeze was blowing their way.  That they could slap each other on their backs and revel in their good luck for they were on their way to more easy cash. 

I agree with you, I would like to improve Brookswood while preserving and actually building upon the character and natural beauty of the area.  But the developers and planners will have to be super careful and do everything properly.  Even then developers have to be watched to ensure they stick to the plan and don't make backroom, under the table deals with the township as is their nature, and the township will have to be watched to make sure they are above board and don't feel that they are their own bosses, as is their nature here in Langley.

For as we have found out with developers and their township 'friends' throughout the lower mainland over the last few decades, trust (or lack of) is a serious issue and screwing the existing residents is part of their game.

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Ban special interests from BC election financing: Huntington

Our local politicians are being influenced right now - with money... lot's of it.  How is that going to affect our future?

http://www.vickihuntington.ca/content/ban-special-interests-bc-election-financing-huntington

Victoria, B.C. – Delta South MLA Vicki Huntington introduced a bill challenging the government to outlaw corporate, union, and out-of-province political donations by restricting contributions to individual British Columbians.
“It’s time to give political influence back to the people of B.C., where it properly belongs” says Huntington, directing her request to Minister of Justice Suzanne Anton.
“Only the government wants to leave the floodgates open for corporate, union, and out-of-province political donations,” says Huntington. “Banning these kinds of donations should be our number one goal if we want to level the playing field and improve voter confidence in decisions made by our elected officials.”
Introducing a campaign finance reform bill last Thursday, Huntington stated: “This bill reasserts the principles of our democratic values by limiting the right to donate to the very people of British Columbia we report to — the individual voter.”
While the B.C. NDP and Green parties support campaign finance reform, the government does not. Huntington says she hopes to draw the attention of B.C.’s Justice Minister, whose Cabinet mandate letter tasks her with reviewing the provincial Election Act. “Minister Anton opposed corporate, union and out-of-province donations in her previous role as a municipal councilor and spoke favorably of the federal campaign finance reforms, which ban corporate and union donations.
“Now, we need Minister Anton to put her words into action for B.C.”
The Election Finance Amendment Act was first introduced by Huntington as part of the independent Democratic Reform Agenda Huntington co-sponsored with then-independent MLAs Bob Simpson and John van Dongen. Last week, Huntington also introduced a democratic reform bill that would have B.C. join the federal government and seven other provinces by moving B.C.’s fixed election date from the spring to the fall, thereby preventing the election from interfering with the provincial budget process.

Do you ever wonder if local campains have become too BIG considering the importance of the positions? Like come on, campain managers for Municipal Elections??


Thursday, October 9, 2014

Jack Froese on Housing...




Langley Township Mayor Jack Froese said many Fraser Valley communities – including his – need to find ways to get more rental homes on the market.

"Not everybody wants to own a house," he said.

The audience included many major development and home construction firms.

Froese said developers want to build as efficiently and profitably as possible, but noted municipalities must plan carefully with an eye to the future.

Future residential development in Langley's Brookswood area will be controversial, he said, but called it a logical fit with development just to the west in Surrey, where the Campbell Heights industrial park is increasingly a magnet for jobs.

Against his original mandate Froese is pro-development.

In fact just about everyone wants to own a house.  Many can't afford one for this very reason.

Stop the foreign speculative real estate investment and things will become less expensive.  If the property is foreign owned then charge them more property tax for the honour of owning a part of Canadian soil.  Housing and revenue alleviated...

With regards to Brookswood: We will always be prepared Jack to stop you from slashing and hacking up Brookswood like you did with Willoughby.