Sooooo, what's up with the questionnaire?

"3. Housing Types
Which of the following statements best represent your interpretation of the types of housing included in the plan? Indicate all that apply.

There should be more emphasis on regular single family lots (4, 6, 8 or 10 upa/10-25 uph, 4-7,000 square foot lots)"

...or 20, 22, or 30...  That is quite the range for what they consider 'regular single family lots'... This process is like some sort of probe that keeps getting more invasive.  Of course if you are in charge of finessing this particular process you can formulate the questions what ever way you want.  It's called manipulation.

"5. Parks and Schools Size and Distribution
What do you think of the park and school sites included in the plan? 
Please note, park and school sites represented on the display board do not reflect exact future sites of schools and parks. These will be determined as development occurs and land acquisition permits (see symbols E, M, and S on the plan). Indicate all that apply."

I predict another mismanagement cluster on this one...  It kind of leaves things wide open to swap more school land with developers doesn't it?  Or worse...

Willoughby schools are close to crisis

http://www.langleytimes.com/opinion/138818834.html

By-the-way the survey will be up until April 30th and can be found here...

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/JKQRBYW